Food & Agriculture · 人与自然 / 农业 / 粮食安全 / 植物科学

餐桌上的“隐性饥饿”:当气候变化偷走粮食里的维生素,基因编辑能把它补回来吗

More than two billion people eat enough calories yet still lack the vitamins and minerals their bodies need — a condition called hidden hunger. As a warming climate quietly drains nutrients from staple crops, scientists argue that precise gene editing must be paired with conventional breeding to keep food both plentiful and nourishing
来源 Nature(2026 年 6 月 25 日)作者 外刊精读专栏日期 2026-10-16难度 极难词数 约 530 词 / 9 段
正午阳光下的麦田与远处农舍的实景照片(配图)
配图:阳光下的麦田一望无际——我们数的是收成有多少吨,却很少问每一粒粮食里到底留下了多少营养(场景摄影配图,仅供教学使用)。

中文导读

衡量饥饿,人们习惯用“热量”这把尺子:只要每天吃够了卡路里,似乎就算吃饱了。但全球有超过 20 亿人,热量其实不缺,身体却长期缺维生素与矿物质——这种看不见的匮乏被称为“隐性饥饿”。它很少出现在饥饿统计里,因为这些人表面不显消瘦,却在日积月累中悄悄损耗健康。问题的一个源头,正是稻米、小麦、玉米、马铃薯、木薯这些主食作物:它们极擅长生产热量,恰因此被广泛种植;而几十年“产量优先”的育种,在把总热量推高的同时,也悄悄拉大了营养的缺口。更麻烦的是,气候变化正在让情况恶化。根特大学与列日大学合作的一项研究推算,在未来气候情景下,小麦籽粒中多种 B 族维生素与矿物质的浓度将明显下降,使营养问题升级为公共卫生问题——高温、干旱与盐碱化不只是让产量变少,还会把营养从收获的籽粒里“夺走”。面对这一局面,2026 年 6 月 25 日《自然》(Nature)刊出的一篇综述追问:科学该如何回应?论文第一作者、根特大学的 Dominique Van Der Straeten 教授与多国专家,考察了基因技术能否在提高作物营养含量的同时,让作物更抗气候胁迫。作者主张,未来农业必须同时满足三项要求:产出足够的粮食、提升营养品质、增强对干旱高温盐碱的抗逆性;只顾其一,往往会拖累另外两项。核心工具是以 CRISPR(基因编辑)为基础的精准育种,它能在极精确的位置改动植物的特定性状,例如提高籽粒累积的维生素与矿物质,或“打开”帮助植物抵御逆境的基因。但作者强调,基因编辑并非“万灵药”:传统育种与其他生物技术同样关键,最大的进步多半来自把多种手段结合起来,并按作物与当地条件量身定制。本文循“背景—结构—压力—研究—论点—工具—边界—紧迫—收束”的链条,追问一个朴素却关键的问题:要喂饱世界,我们究竟该种出“更多”的粮食,还是“更好”的粮食?

一、原文精读

鼠标悬停在带 蓝色虚线下划线 的生词上,即可查看词性和释义。

🔊 英音朗读 · British English
由英音语音合成(en-GB)朗读全文原文,共 9 段。播放时原文会随进度逐句高亮,建议先盲听抓大意,再对照下方原文跟读,留意重音、连读与停顿。
【1】More than two billion people consume enough calories to survive, yet still lack the vitamins and minerals their bodies need. This quiet form of malnutrition, known as hidden hunger, rarely appears in hunger statistics, because those affected are not visibly starving but merely undernourished in ways that slowly weaken their health. For billions of them, the shortfall begins with the staple crops — rice, wheat, maize, potatoes and cassava — that supply most of the energy in their daily diets.
【2】These staple crops are remarkably efficient at producing calories, which is precisely why they were adopted so widely. Yet decades of breeding that prized yield above all else raised calorie output while quietly widening the gap in vitamins and minerals, producing a food system that can fill a stomach without nourishing the body.
【3】Now climate change is quietly making that problem worse, in ways that are only beginning to be measured. A companion study jointly led by Ghent University and the University of Liège found that under future climate scenarios, the density of several B-vitamins and minerals in wheat grains will fall sharply, turning a nutritional challenge into a public-health one. Heat, drought and rising salinity do not merely reduce how much a field produces; they can also strip nutrients from the harvested grain.
【4】Against that backdrop, a review published in Nature in June 2026 asks how science might respond. Its lead author, Professor Dominique Van Der Straeten of Ghent University, worked with experts from institutions worldwide to examine how genetic technologies could raise the nutrient content of crops while making them tougher against climate stress.
【5】The authors argue that future agriculture has to meet three demands at once: it must produce enough food, improve its nutritional quality, and strengthen crops' resilience to drought, heat and salinity. Pursuing any one of these goals in isolation, the authors warn, is likely to undermine progress on the other two.
【6】Their central tool is CRISPR-based genome editing, a technique that allows scientists to alter specific plant traits with extraordinary precision. It can raise the vitamins and minerals that a grain accumulates, or switch on genes that help a plant cope with environmental stress. Because the edits are so targeted, they can improve nutrition without the long, unpredictable process of crossing thousands of plants.
【7】Crucially, however, the authors do not present gene editing as a silver bullet that can solve the problem on its own. Conventional breeding and older biotechnological methods, they insist, remain just as important, and the greatest gains are likely to come from combining approaches and tailoring them to particular crops and local conditions.
【8】The urgency of the situation is easy to overlook from the comfortable distance of a well-stocked supermarket. With roughly 700 million people still facing caloric hunger and the world committed to ending hunger by 2030, the authors argue that precision breeding should be adopted alongside other technologies rather than delayed by debate.
【9】What the review ultimately proposes is a shift in how we measure success: not merely how many tonnes a field yields, but how much nourishment a single grain can deliver. Feeding a growing population may depend less on growing more food than on growing better food.

原文出处:本文根据 Nature 综述论文《Genetic technologies to enhance crop nutritional value under climate change》(Dominique Van Der Straeten 等;Ghent University 及国际合作机构;Nature, 2026-06-25;DOI 10.1038/s41586-026-10593-6)及配套研究(Cao et al., Advanced Science, 2026)公开资料改写整理,供学习使用。

三、长难句分析(三步拆解法)

Yet decades of breeding that prized yield above all else raised calorie output while quietly widening the gap in vitamins and minerals, producing a food system that can fill a stomach without nourishing the body.
主干:decades of breeding ... raised calorie output(主语 + 谓语 + 宾语)
定语从句:that prized yield above all else(修饰 breeding,“把产量看得高于一切”的育种)
while 引导的时间/伴随状语:while quietly widening the gap in vitamins and minerals(一边推高热量,一边悄悄拉大营养差距)
现在分词作结果状语:producing a food system ...(修饰整句,说明最终造成的结果)
定语从句:that can fill a stomach without nourishing the body(修饰 food system;without doing 作否定补充)
考点:定语从句;while 表同时发生;分词作结果状语;without doing 的否定补充
译文:然而,几十年“产量至上”的育种在推高热量产出的同时,也悄悄拉大了维生素与矿物质上的差距,最终造就了一个能填饱肚子、却养不好依赖它生存的身体的粮食体系。
A companion study jointly led by Ghent University and the University of Liège found that under future climate scenarios, the density of several B-vitamins and minerals in wheat grains will fall sharply, turning a nutritional challenge into a public-health one.
主干:A companion study ... found that ...(主语 + 谓语 + 宾语从句)
过去分词作定语:jointly led by Ghent University and the University of Liège(修饰 study,说明由谁联合主导)
宾语从句:that ... the density of several B-vitamins and minerals ... will fall sharply(介词短语 under future climate scenarios 作状语前置)
现在分词作结果状语:turning a nutritional challenge into a public-health one(one 指代 challenge,避免重复)
考点:分词作后置定语;宾语从句中的状语前置;turn A into B;one 的替代用法
译文:由根特大学与列日大学联合主导的一项配套研究发现:在未来气候情景下,小麦籽粒中多种 B 族维生素与矿物质的浓度将大幅下降,把一个营养问题变成了公共卫生问题。
The authors argue that future agriculture has to meet three demands at once: it must produce enough food, improve its nutritional quality, and strengthen crops' resilience to drought, heat and salinity.
主干:The authors argue that ...(主句 + 宾语从句)
宾语从句主干:future agriculture has to meet three demands at once(at once 意为“同时”)
冒号后的同列三项:it must produce enough food, improve its nutritional quality, and strengthen crops' resilience ...(三个并列谓语,共用情态动词 must)
介词短语作定语:to drought, heat and salinity(修饰 resilience,表示“对……的抗逆性”)
考点:宾语从句;冒号引出并列说明;并列谓语共用 must;at once 的“同时”义;resilience to 的搭配
译文:作者主张,未来农业必须同时满足三项要求:产出足够的粮食、提升其营养品质、增强作物对干旱、高温与盐碱的抗逆能力。
Conventional breeding and older biotechnological methods, they insist, remain just as important, and the greatest gains are likely to come from combining several approaches and tailoring them to particular crops and local growing conditions.
主语 + 插入语:Conventional breeding and older biotechnological methods, they insist(they insist 为插入语,主语实为前面的并列名词)
并列分句一:... remain just as important(remain 作系动词,just as important 作表语)
并列分句二:the greatest gains are likely to come from combining ... and tailoring ...(两个动名词并列作 from 的宾语)
固定搭配:tailor sth to sth(使……适合……)
考点:插入语;并列句;动名词作介词宾语;tailor ... to ... 的搭配;just as + 形容词
译文:他们强调,传统育种与较早的生物技术同样重要;最大的进步很可能来自把若干方法结合起来,并针对特定作物与当地种植条件量体裁衣。
With roughly 700 million people still facing caloric hunger and the world committed to ending hunger by 2030, the authors argue that precision breeding should be adopted alongside other technologies rather than delayed by debate.
with 复合结构作状语:With roughly 700 million people still facing caloric hunger and the world committed to ending hunger by 2030(“with + 宾语 + 分词”,表示背景或伴随)
主句:the authors argue that ...(主句 + 宾语从句)
宾语从句中的被动:precision breeding should be adopted alongside other technologies(情态动词 + 被动语态)
rather than 的取舍:rather than delayed by debate(与其被争论耽搁,不如……)
考点:with 复合结构;宾语从句;should be adopted 的被动;rather than 连接并列成分表取舍
译文:在仍有约 7 亿人面临热量饥饿、而世界又承诺到 2030 年消除饥饿的背景下,作者主张,精准育种应当与其他技术并行采用,而不是被无休止的争论耽搁。

四、全文大意

衡量饥饿,人们习惯用“热量”这把尺子:只要每天摄入足够的卡路里,似乎就算吃饱了。可全球有超过 20 亿人,热量其实不缺,身体却长期缺乏必需的维生素与矿物质——这种看不见的匮乏,被称为“隐性饥饿”。它很少出现在饥饿统计里,因为受影响的人并非肉眼可见的消瘦,只是长期营养不足,在日积月累中悄悄损耗健康。问题的源头之一,正是稻米、小麦、玉米、马铃薯、木薯这些主食作物:它们极擅长生产热量,恰恰因此被广泛种植;而几十年“产量至上”的育种,在把总热量不断推高的同时,也悄悄拉大了营养上的缺口,最终造就了一个能填饱肚子、却养不好身体的粮食体系。更麻烦的是,气候变化正在让情况恶化。由根特大学与列日大学联合主导的一项配套研究推算,在未来气候情景下,小麦籽粒中多种 B 族维生素与矿物质的浓度将大幅下降,把营养问题升级为公共卫生问题;高温、干旱与日益严重的盐碱化,不仅让田地产量变少,还会把营养从收获的籽粒中夺走。面对这样的局面,2026 年 6 月 25 日《自然》刊出的一篇综述追问:科学究竟该如何回应?论文第一作者、根特大学的 Dominique Van Der Straeten 教授与多国专家一道,考察了基因技术能否在提高作物营养含量的同时,让作物更抗气候胁迫。作者主张,未来农业必须同时满足三项要求:产出足够的粮食、提升其营养品质、增强对干旱高温盐碱的抗逆能力;只顾其中一项,往往会拖累另外两项。其核心工具,是以 CRISPR 为基础的基因组编辑:它能在极精确的位置改动植物的特定性状,比如提高籽粒所累积的维生素与矿物质,或“打开”帮助植物抵御逆境的基因,而且不必经历漫长、结果难料的杂交过程。但作者强调,基因编辑并非“万灵药”:传统育种与较早的生物技术同样关键,最大的进步多半来自把多种手段结合起来,并针对特定作物与当地种植条件量身定制。文章也提醒我们留意紧迫性——在物资充足的超市里,这种紧迫感很容易被忽视;可全球仍有约 7 亿人面临热量饥饿,而世界已承诺 2030 年消除饥饿,精准育种理当与其他技术并行采用,而不是被无休止的争论耽搁。归根结底,这篇综述主张转变我们衡量成功的标准:不只看一亩地能打多少吨粮食,更要看一粒粮食能带来多少营养。要喂饱不断增长的世界人口,或许不在于种出“更多”的粮食,而在于种出“更好”的粮食。

五、思考与仿写

思考题:文中第 2 段说,几十年“产量至上”的育种“在推高热量产出的同时悄悄拉大了营养缺口”。作者为什么要把“产量”与“营养”放在一起对比?再想一步:如果你是政策制定者,面对“2030 年消除饥饿”的目标,你会更愿意把资源投给基因编辑这类精准育种,还是投给传统育种和改善饮食结构?请结合文中的“三重挑战”说明理由。
仿写题:仿照第 5 段 "X has to meet three demands at once: it must A, B, and C. Pursuing any one of these goals in isolation, ..., is likely to undermine progress on the other two."(has to meet three demands at once + 冒号列举 + in isolation + undermine)的句式,围绕「一项改革需要同时兼顾的几重目标」写一个段落。

六、文章结构图解

文章段落结构(共 9 段) 1 · 背景:逾 20 亿人“热量够、营养缺”的隐性饥饿 2 · 结构:主食作物擅长产热量;“产量至上”育种拉大营养缺口 3 · 压力:气候变化使作物营养密度下降,营养问题升级为公共卫生问题 4 · 研究:2026《自然》综述——Van Der Straeten 与多国专家 5 · 论点:农业须同时做到“产量足、营养好、抗逆强” 6 · 工具:CRISPR 基因组编辑,精准提高营养、开启抗逆基因 7 · 边界:并非“万灵药”,须与传统育种等多种手段结合 8 · 紧迫:约 7 亿人仍受热量饥饿困扰,2030 年目标不宜被争论耽搁 9 · 收束:转变衡量标准——与其种“更多”,不如种“更好”
全文共 9 段,按「背景 → 结构 → 压力 → 研究 → 论点 → 工具 → 边界 → 紧迫 → 收束」的递进逻辑层层展开。